🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial move to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are watching closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Movement

Across Europe, a rising number of countries are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that smartphones and networks are "stealing our kids' youth". The policy could be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged lawmakers to enact a law raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a advisory statement calling for a ban for minors except if guardian approval is provided. Although it warns of the "addictive" design of these services, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a useful first step," said one MEP supporting the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "based on strong research".

Last year, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. One foundation founded by the family of a teenager who died after being exposed to dangerous online content argues that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when users turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for children," said a leading child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, legislation is primarily happening at the regional government level amid national stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with any further use needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed measures mandating adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from various politicians to copy the Australian example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Beyond the West, other nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world agencies adopt a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even backfire". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

While this worldwide discussion continues, the steps of Australia and others indicate that states around the world are increasingly prepared to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.